Last December the Environmental Protection Agency relaxed pollution standards for Bush's buddies in the energy industry. Air, water, and soil pollution are serious issues to most Americans, so you would expect that such a rule change would be based on science and empirical data. Ha ha, just kidding, this is the Bush administration we're talking about:

Congressional investigators say the Environmental Protection Agency relied on anecdotes from industries it regulates, not comprehensive data, when it claimed that relaxing air pollution rules for industrial plants would cut emissions and reduce health risks. The General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress, said in a report Monday that EPA lacked scientific evidence for its claims that the Clean Air Act's "new source review" program needed revising because it discourages energy-efficiency improvements at plants.

Source: CBS News EPA Clean-Air Claims Disputed Since when does the Bush administration need evidence to do anything? We invaded Iraq even though there was no evidence they had weapons of mass destruction. Bush promotes abstinence-based sex education, even though the evidence clearly shows it doesn't work. Ideology trumps evidence every time with these bozos. I don't have any war opinions today, but there's an interesting discussion going on at Internet Infidels on whether the war in Iraq is a Vietnam-style quagmire or just a fiasco. Iraq: Quagmire or Fiasco? More US troops have died in the occupation than in the invasion
- posted by truthspeaker    Comments

 

Another Bush Lie Exposed

Remember those Iraqi unmanned aircraft that Colin Powell claimed could fly to the US and deliver chemical or biological weapons? It turns out they were just reconnaissance drones like we use. This came as no surprise to many in the Air Force and the Missile Defense Agency, who had been saying as much all along. AP story at CBS News Let's see, the aluminum rocket tubes, the mobile chemical weapons labs, the 45-minute nuclear launch claim - we're running out of lies to expose. Bush and his buddies will need to come up with some new ones!
- posted by truthspeaker    Comments

 
Someone at the Associated Press finally remembered that the press is supposed to be a watchdog, not a cheerleader. Here is an article that deconstructs, point by point, the speech Secretary of State Colin Powell gave to the UN Security Council last February in an attempt to justify the US attack on Iraq. Turns out it was all a load of crap. Powell's push toward Iraq war questioned
- posted by truthspeaker    Comments

 
I've been out of commission for a while, so today's post will catch up on a few recent news stories. Let's start with this one, from The Guardian: 'Bring us home': GIs flood US with war-weary emails The article is about US soldiers and their families becoming increasingly angry about the way the Iraq situation is being handled. Said one mother of a soldier: "I want them to bring our troops home. I am appalled at Bush's policies. He has got us into a terrible mess." Even the Army Times has started to criticize the Bush administration on its editorial page for cutting combat pay and veterans benefits. I guess "support our troops" doesn't mean what it used to. Interestingly, The Guardian is a British newspaper. I have yet to see this covered in the American press. Closer to home, the Toronto Star has an article about what has been happening to Americans who speak out against the Iraq war: Americans Pay Price for Speaking Out You will have to read the article to believe it. Remember when America was the land of the free? Again, that article is in a Canadian newspaper. I have seen very little coverage of attacks on anti-Iraq-war activists in the American press. Last but certainly not least, here is an article from the New York Times about our old friend the Halliburton Corporation. If you've been paying attention you know that the federal government awarded Halliburton (Dick Cheney's former employer) a wide-reaching contract to secure oilfields in Iraq after the invasion in a questionable deal in which no other companies were given an opportunity to bid. As if that giveaway weren't enough, now some of their competitors are complaining that the Army Corps of Engineers is structuring new contracts in such a way that only Halliburton would qualify for them. Rivals Say Halliburton Dominates Iraq Oil Work (this is actually the Yahoo feed from the New York Times; free registration may be required). At this point it should be obvious to every thinking American that the invasion of Iraq had nothing at all to do with terrorism or a near-term threat to the United States. The president and the administration lied outright about Iraq's potential for chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. This war is nothing more than a scheme to use American taxpayer dollars, and American blood, to secure business opportunities for Bush and Cheney's buddies in the energy and defense industries. But the American press is barely saying boo about it. When Clinton lied about his sex life the press and Congress were on him like ugly on a mule. Bush lied in order to justify a war, in which Americans died and are still dieing, and the press is looking the other way. Congress, meanwhile, is busy trying to decide how to turn Medicaid into a corporate welfare program for pharmaceutical companies. Wake up America!
- posted by truthspeaker    Comments